Interesting. Another workaround is probably to make it constexpr On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:50 AM Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
> FAILED: C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~3.0\VC\bin\cl.exe /nologo /TP > -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -DLLDB_DISABLE_CURSES -DLLDB_DISABLE_LIBEDIT > -DLLDB_PYTHON_HOME=\"C:/Users/lldb_build/ll/prebuilts/python-2015/x86\" > -DLLDB_USE_BUILTIN_DEMANGLER -DLLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL -DUNICODE > -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS > -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -D_UNICODE > -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS > -Itools\lldb\source\Commands > -IC:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\lldb\source\Commands > -IC:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\lldb\include > -Itools\lldb\include -Iinclude > -IC:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\include > -IC:\Users\lldb_build\ll\prebuilts\python-2015\x86\Include > -IC:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\clang\include > -Itools\lldb\..\clang\include > -IC:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\lldb\source\. /DWIN32 > /D_WINDOWS /W4 -wd4141 -wd4146 -wd4180 -wd4244 -wd4258 -wd4267 > -wd4291 -wd4345 -wd4351 -wd4355 -wd4456 -wd4457 -wd4458 -wd4459 > -wd4503 -wd4624 -wd4722 -wd4800 -wd4100 -wd4127 -wd4512 -wd4505 > -wd4610 -wd4510 -wd4702 -wd4245 -wd4706 -wd4310 -wd4701 -wd4703 > -wd4389 -wd4611 -wd4805 -wd4204 -wd4577 -wd4091 -wd4592 -wd4319 > -wd4324 -w14062 -we4238 /Zc:inline /Zc:strictStrings /Oi > /Zc:rvalueCast /MD /O2 /Ob2 /D NDEBUG -wd4018 -wd4068 -wd4150 > -wd4251 -wd4521 -wd4530 /EHs-c- /GR- /showIncludes > > /Fotools\lldb\source\Commands\CMakeFiles\lldbCommands.dir\CommandObjectFrame.cpp.obj > /Fdtools\lldb\source\Commands\CMakeFiles\lldbCommands.dir\ /FS -c > > C:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectFrame.cpp > > C:\lldbSlave\lldb-win7-android\llvm\tools\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectFrame.cpp(202): > error C3493: 'qualify_cxx_base_classes' cannot be implicitly captured > because no default capture mode has been specified > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. > > > Basically, clang and gcc are perfectly happy with you referencing a > const variable (maybe it has to be of integral type) from a lambda > without an explicit capture (a behavior which actually quite surprises > me), but MSVC chokes on that. > > The compiler is MSCV 2015, but I don't know which update. This is its > ident string, if that means anything to you: > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x86 > > > > On 2 March 2017 at 15:18, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > What capture does it say is missing? Also what version of msvc? > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:17 AM Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Clang-cl > >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:51 AM Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2 March 2017 at 00:05, Zachary Turner via lldb-commits > >>> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> - DumpValueObjectOptions::DeclPrintingHelper helper = > >>>> - [&valobj_sp, qualify_cxx_base_classes]( > >>>> - ConstString type, ConstString var, > >>>> - const DumpValueObjectOptions &opts, Stream &stream) -> > bool > >>>> { > >>>> + DumpValueObjectOptions::DeclPrintingHelper helper = [&valobj_sp]( > >>>> + ConstString type, ConstString var, const > DumpValueObjectOptions > >>>> &opts, > >>>> + Stream &stream) -> bool { > >>>> const ValueObject::GetExpressionPathFormat format = > ValueObject:: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Zach, > >>> > >>> what's the compiler that was giving you this warning. The version of > MSVC > >>> I am using is complaining about a missing capture when you removed > this. > >>> > >>> I've updated the code in a way which should make both compilers > >>> satisfied, but I'd like to know if we are using an unsupported version > of > >>> MSVC or something. > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> pl > >>> > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits