mizvekov wrote: > Additionally, just for some namespace sanity (especially from the perspective > of Linux's use of OBTs), can we have the type specifier named > "__ob_$behavior": __ob_wrap, __ob_trap ? That would make things a bit cleaner > for Linux's resulting macros for OBT usage to de-conflict possible namespace > collisions there...
The type specifier is optional, you can still use the attribute syntax here, so if you are hiding this behind macros anyway, might as well just use that spelling instead? Unless I have misunderstood. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148914 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
