DavidSpickett wrote:
Taking one as an example:
```
enum class FunctionNameRepresentation {
eName,
eNameWithArgs,
eNameWithNoArgs
};
```
And we do have a return for each of the cases.
So it feels like a limitation in GCC's analysis, is that right or did they make
a decision to warn in these cases? I can see some value in making people mark
the "unused" exit path like you might a fallthrough case.
If you have some background on it please add it to the PR description. I'll
probably want to cite it again at some point :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159327
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
