JDevlieghere wrote: We discussed this offline today. I should've been less terse in explaining my idea, which is to use weak pointers all the way down, lock it just before we're going to remove it to create a critical section, account for the increase in refcount, and then release the pointer. Augusto seems on both and was going to give that a go.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155331 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
