eugene added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30234#683018, @jingham wrote:
> Anyway, it might be better just to do that to this file using the top level > .clang-format. Note that you are making several choices which were not the > choices made by clang-format using the .clang-format file that was used to > implement this reformatting. We probably shouldn't revise that decision > piecemeal. It wasn't my intention to revise any formatting decisions made earlier. I just ran 'clang-format -style=file -i main.cpp' assuming that it will actually make the file complaint with the lldb's coding style by using top level .clang-format. Is there any document other than http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html describing LLDB coding conventions? https://reviews.llvm.org/D30234 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
