labath added a comment. It does not seem too controversial, but I am not very confident reviewing lit changes. @beanz, could you take a look at this?
================ Comment at: lit/lit.cfg:124 -debugserver = lit.util.which('debugserver', llvm_tools_dir) -lldb = lit.util.which('lldb', llvm_tools_dir) +debugserver = lit.util.which('debugserver', config.environment['PATH']) +lldb = lit.util.which('lldb', config.environment['PATH']) ---------------- Wouldn't it be better to use lldb_tools_dir instead of the PATH here? Less chance to pick up the wrong tool accidentally? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D29985 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits