joker-eph wrote: > > I don't understand why this happens again and again though. > > Seems pretty obvious to me: it's much easier for the author to submit one PR.
The fact that it is easier for the author is why I would object any policy preventing it: we shouldn't discourage people from improving the codebase. I've been sending patches that spans subprojects before we even moved to git, I don't quite see the problem with this really. On some more consequent changes there is the argument of revert: if a revert is needed we don't want to revert things that could have landed cleanly. But that argument applies to any kind of changes where we push for things that can be decoupled to be landed independently. Applied to a PR like this one, this argument means that each individual hunk in the whole diff could land independently (oh well, that could be scripted, but there is low value here). So much for trivial changes ultimately! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156270 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
