================ @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ void SymbolFileNativePDB::CacheFunctionNames() { llvm::cantFail(SymbolDeserializer::deserializeAs<ProcSym>(*iter)); if ((proc.Flags & ProcSymFlags::IsUnreachable) != ProcSymFlags::None) continue; - if (proc.Name.empty()) + if (proc.Name.empty() || proc.FunctionType.isNoneType()) ---------------- Michael137 wrote:
Would `!proc.FunctionType.isSimple()` be more robust? Or can `FunctionType` never be "simple"? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153382 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits