DavidSpickett wrote:

Long term, if the WASM standard makes recommendations for debugging then that's 
great. You are correct there.

Short term, users will need to know what to expect so we need a short, simple, 
answer to "I tried lldb with whatever runtime and it didn't work". Which 
ideally is "X is known to work to this specific extent, patches are welcome to 
support Y and Z".

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150143
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to