labath wrote: > > Sorry for going off-topic, but what does this say about the support for > > `i386-apple-*` as a whole? I find the prospect of dropping that exciting, > > as I believe that is the only target where eh_ and debug_frame register > > numbers are different. > > I think we can remove i386-macos support, short of booting a seven year old > OS on a machine at least that old, and who knows if everything in C++17 we > use is even supported by the compilers back then. I know there are sometimes > open source people trying to build & use a modern lldb on older > configurations, but I think this would be a tough one to have working at this > point. I wouldn't feel bad about any patches removing this support. I'll try > to start removing these things as I have time/see an opportunity. > > Apple announced that the macOS version being released in a few months (macOS > 26) would be the final version that supports Intel machines at all. We'll > have a business requirement to keep the 64-bit Intel support for another > release cycle or so after that. What open source contributors might be using > the llvm.org sources on is a different question, but the entire target > support is going to go away before much longer I think.
Got it. Thanks for clarifying. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146480 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
