https://github.com/labath commented:
Looks good modulo the failure in the libstdc++ version. The type name comes out different, presumably because libstdc++ doesn't contain the magic to print the template as std::string. Testing string name printing is not really relevant for the unique_ptr formatter, so I'd delete the check from there. Testing that `SomeTemplate<std::string>` prints the right way is useful, but would be better of in the test for preferred name printing (if we don't do that already). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147031 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
