da-viper wrote: > if we don't have a symbol, it would be nice to have a source reference for a > given range (say the next 64 or 128 instructions)
I was able to find a scenario there can have an executable address without an associated symbol. from one of the test cases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-dap/stackTraceMissingModule/main.c I would prefer to add it to a different PR to make sure it is easier to review and reverting it in case of an error does not affect the current implementation. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144364 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
