Jlalond wrote: > It's crude but maybe just include SI_KERNEL in there? "sent by kernel > (SI_KERNEL)". Then we don't have to explain the meaning of SI_KERNEL but I > the user do have something I can look up and read about it. And if they do > have a kernel side problem, doing some reading is what they'll need to do > anyway.
As @labath mentioned there are a lot of things that could cause this. So I think the crude approach is the right one! I've updated the patch. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144800 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
