cmtice wrote: > A very predictable question. Why is the implementation of this more > complicated than `base->GetChildMemberWithName(name)`. I think it shouldn't > be. > > To avoid repeating the same points over and over, I suggest going through the > discussion on the dereference/addressof patch. If you still have questions > after that, let me know.
GetChildMemberWithName didn't handle everything correctly. I've fixed part of that now. There's still a bug in the code that searches for fields in base classes, which I want to try to find & fix. I've removed all the special handling code from this PR. Please review again. Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138093 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
