================
@@ -2794,37 +2794,26 @@ ValueObjectSP ValueObject::Dereference(Status &error) {
if (m_deref_valobj)
return m_deref_valobj->GetSP();
- const bool is_pointer_or_reference_type = IsPointerOrReferenceType();
- if (is_pointer_or_reference_type) {
- bool omit_empty_base_classes = true;
- bool ignore_array_bounds = false;
-
- std::string child_name_str;
- uint32_t child_byte_size = 0;
- int32_t child_byte_offset = 0;
- uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_size = 0;
- uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_offset = 0;
- bool child_is_base_class = false;
- bool child_is_deref_of_parent = false;
- const bool transparent_pointers = false;
- CompilerType compiler_type = GetCompilerType();
- uint64_t language_flags = 0;
+ std::string child_name_str;
+ uint32_t child_byte_size = 0;
+ int32_t child_byte_offset = 0;
+ uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_size = 0;
+ uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_offset = 0;
+ bool child_is_base_class = false;
----------------
labath wrote:
I think `child_is_base_class` should go away as well, and maybe the bitfield
fields as well (in principle I can imagine a pointer to a bitfield, but I don't
think any current language has those).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135843
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
