================
@@ -380,6 +380,18 @@ def wait_for_event(self, filter=None, timeout=None):
)
return None
+ def wait_for_events(self, events, timeout=None):
+ """Wait for a list of events in `events` in any order.
+ Return the events not hit before the timeout expired"""
+ events = events[:] # Make a copy to avoid modifying the input
+ end_time = time.time() + timeout if timeout else None
+ while events and (not end_time or end_time > time.time()):
+ event_dict = self.wait_for_event(filter=events, timeout=timeout)
+ if not event_dict:
+ continue
+ events.remove(event_dict["event"])
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
Yeah, I should have phrased it differently. What I meant was that the current
code already doesn't quite do what you'd expect (as you pointed out: it waits
longer than the timeout), in which case I think waiting up to `timeout` for
each event is more predictable. The other alternative is to wait up to n times
for `timeout/n` but I think that also needless complicates the code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137278
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
