kastiglione wrote: @JDevlieghere Does lit run all tests, even those that have duplicate names? If so, it seems like a step back to break lit from doing what it's capable of doing.
This code contains the below comment that proposes eliminating the test name uniqueness constraint. If that is the desired goal, then it's another reason to not put more uniqueness constraints in place. ```python # Future improvement: find all the places where we work with base # names and convert to full paths. We have directory structure # to disambiguate these, so we shouldn't need this constraint. ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137681 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
