================
@@ -1692,6 +1692,20 @@ class Target : public 
std::enable_shared_from_this<Target>,
   }
 };
 
+/// The private implementation backing SBLock.
+struct APILock {
+  APILock(std::recursive_mutex &mutex) : lock(mutex) {}
+  std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> lock;
+};
+
+/// The private implementation used by SBLock to hand out the target API mutex.
+/// It has a TargetSP to ensure the lock cannot outlive the target.
+struct TargetAPILock : public APILock {
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:

This doesn't quite work here because it's a C++20 extension and we don't 
actually need a pointer to the `mutex`, we need the lock. If we did build with 
C++20 support I could change `TargetAPILock` to hold onto a shared_ptr for the 
mutex, to make it a little bit more obvious, but in the absence of that I think 
the current approach is the best we can do. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to