jimingham wrote: If possible, yes. It would be even more apropos if you could convince yourself that the dynamic type was bigger than the buffer for the static type, and you refused to read past the buffer...
Jim > On Feb 4, 2025, at 3:12 PM, Augusto Noronha ***@***.***> wrote: > > > To make sure I understand, you want me to write a unittest where I have a > value object, and make sure it's dynamic value object child uses the local > buffer to store the contents? What should I test? That it prints correctly? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125143#issuecomment-2635270445>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVW4757UFB2E5GUBHVDL2OFCMVAVCNFSM6AAAAABWGPIRJGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMZVGI3TANBUGU>. > You are receiving this because your review was requested. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125143 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
