================
@@ -370,6 +370,31 @@ bool SymbolContext::GetAddressRange(uint32_t scope,
uint32_t range_idx,
return false;
}
+Address SymbolContext::GetAddress(uint32_t scope,
+ bool use_inline_block_range) const {
+ if ((scope & eSymbolContextLineEntry) && line_entry.IsValid())
+ return line_entry.range.GetBaseAddress();
+
+ if (scope & eSymbolContextBlock) {
+ Block *block_to_use = (block && use_inline_block_range)
+ ? block->GetContainingInlinedBlock()
+ : block;
+ if (block_to_use) {
+ Address addr;
+ block_to_use->GetStartAddress(addr);
+ return addr;
+ }
+ }
----------------
labath wrote:
> Giving a single address to a block considered as a logical entity is
> problematic, but the address of the start of the block referenced by a
> SymbolContext doesn't have that problem.
I guess, if you define the "start of a block" as "the lowest address in the
block". This definition is sort of what I have a problem with because we have
also defined the "start of a function" as the "lowest address in the function",
but then also used it as "the entry point of the function", and this was fine
until it wasn't. I don't think we're going to have the same problem with blocks
that we did with functions, but I don't think this is completely right either.
I also don't really have an alternative proposal, and we already do have
`Block::GetStartAddress`, which I have no intention of touching, so if you say
this is okay, I'm happy to go along with it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123340
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
