jimingham wrote: I still feel like it would be better to have a way to ask up front if the process supports reverse continue and shortcut attempts to do so as early as possible (e.g. if you ask a command to reverse continue and the process doesn't support it, we should return with an error right away and not do any more work.) But if you really feel that this will over-complicate the design, I'll be content with expressing my sentiments this one more time...
Other than that, the code parts of this look fine. I'm not so familiar with the parts of the testsuite this builds on, so it would be great if someone more familiar with that part would give that a look. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112079 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
