vitalybuka wrote: > IIUC, the build that encountered issues in this patch ([in the comment > above](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380#issuecomment-2590801533)) > is a flavour of (2), right? That seems surprising to me though since we also > use the same flags when configuring libc++: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libcxx/CMakeLists.txt#L596 > > So the difference would be that you folks are building libc++ instrumented > via the bootstrapping build instead of the "runtimes" build that we use for > the rest of libc++ CI. > I also fail to understand why our own bootstrapping build pre-commit CI > didn't trip this wire.
it's no.1 The difference Is that https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/symbolizer/scripts/build_symbolizer.sh builds build libc++ into IR full LTO, with minimal features as possible to be able to build LLVM symbolizer. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
