================
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
DumpValueObjectOptions dump_options = m_varobj_options.GetAsDumpOptions(
m_expr_options.m_verbosity, m_format_options.GetFormat());
- dump_options.SetHideRootName(suppress_result);
+ dump_options.SetHideRootName(suppress_result)
+ .SetExpandPointerTypeFlags(lldb::eTypeIsObjC);
----------------
kastiglione wrote:
it definitely should be considered, but I didn't want to impede this change
with those possibly more debatable changes. I have more thoughts on this, I'll
write them up later today or this week.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117500
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
