================
@@ -259,22 +256,19 @@ bool DWARFDebugInfoEntry::GetDIENamesAndRanges(
}
}
- if (ranges.IsEmpty()) {
- if (lo_pc != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
- if (hi_pc != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS && hi_pc > lo_pc)
- ranges.Append(DWARFRangeList::Entry(lo_pc, hi_pc - lo_pc));
- else
- ranges.Append(DWARFRangeList::Entry(lo_pc, 0));
- }
+ if (ranges.empty() && lo_pc != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
+ ranges.emplace_back(
+ lo_pc, (hi_pc != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS && hi_pc > lo_pc) ? hi_pc : 0);
----------------
bulbazord wrote:
The possibilities for the 2nd argument went from `hi_pc - lo_pc` or `0` to
`hi_pc` or `0`. Is this intentional? I'm not sure if the format is now `(base
address, length)` or `(low address, high address)`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116620
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
