DhruvSrivastavaX wrote: > Do you actually need to parse the headers yourself? The reason for using the > llvm implementation was so that we can avoid that. FWICS, all of this data > should be available through the `(file|auxiliary)Header(32|64)` APIs.
Okay, I'll take a look at that. > BTW, this is exactly the kind of granularity I was looking for. Happy to hear that! Will follow the similar practice. > I don't know, but I wouldn't be worried about that. The test failure is more > of a concern. Yeah, I think I missed the test case modification accordingly. Will update! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116338 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
