================
@@ -0,0 +1,486 @@
+"""
+Specification, compiler, disassembler, and interpreter
+for LLDB dataformatter bytecode.
+
+See formatter-bytecode.md for more details.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+# Types
+type_String = 1
+type_Int = 2
+type_UInt = 3
+type_Object = 4
+type_Type = 5
+
+# Opcodes
+opcode = dict()
+
+
+def define_opcode(n, mnemonic, name):
+    globals()["op_" + name] = n
+    if mnemonic:
+        opcode[mnemonic] = n
+    opcode[n] = mnemonic
+
+
+define_opcode(1, "dup", "dup")
+define_opcode(2, "drop", "drop")
+define_opcode(3, "pick", "pick")
+define_opcode(4, "over", "over")
+define_opcode(5, "swap", "swap")
+define_opcode(6, "rot", "rot")
+
+define_opcode(0x10, "{", "begin")
+define_opcode(0x11, "if", "if")
+define_opcode(0x12, "ifelse", "ifelse")
+
+define_opcode(0x20, None, "lit_uint")
+define_opcode(0x21, None, "lit_int")
+define_opcode(0x22, None, "lit_string")
+define_opcode(0x23, None, "lit_selector")
+
+define_opcode(0x30, "+", "plus")
+define_opcode(0x31, "-", "minus")
+define_opcode(0x32, "*", "mul")
+define_opcode(0x33, "/", "div")
+define_opcode(0x34, "%", "mod")
+define_opcode(0x35, "<<", "shl")
+define_opcode(0x36, ">>", "shr")
+define_opcode(0x37, "shra", "shra")
+
+define_opcode(0x40, "&", "and")
+define_opcode(0x41, "|", "or")
+define_opcode(0x42, "^", "xor")
+define_opcode(0x43, "~", "not")
+
+define_opcode(0x50, "=", "eq")
+define_opcode(0x51, "!=", "neq")
+define_opcode(0x52, "<", "lt")
+define_opcode(0x53, ">", "gt")
+define_opcode(0x54, "=<", "le")
+define_opcode(0x55, ">=", "ge")
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:

Then here I was thinking why not have the spaceship compare `<=>` instead of 
all these but we're not optimising for the size of the encoding space here, but 
for the size of the compiled program, correct?

So spaceship plus an if to check for the result you want is going to be bigger 
than a dedicated opcode for that comparison.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113398
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to