slydiman wrote:

> Can we change the Darwin case to `USE_LIBCPP` though? The less reliance on 
> the system stdlib the better i think.

I cannot test it on Darwin, so I would leave that to the Darwin experts.

> Also lets check that the PR CI actually does run the test (aka doesn't 
> trigger the skip added here)

The test TestStdCXXDisassembly seems passed in PR CI. I'm going to merge this 
PR.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112357
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to