slydiman wrote: > Can we change the Darwin case to `USE_LIBCPP` though? The less reliance on > the system stdlib the better i think.
I cannot test it on Darwin, so I would leave that to the Darwin experts. > Also lets check that the PR CI actually does run the test (aka doesn't > trigger the skip added here) The test TestStdCXXDisassembly seems passed in PR CI. I'm going to merge this PR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112357 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits