DmT021 wrote: > I think that's where the real perf difference you were measuring kicked in > (you showed a 10.5 second versus 13.4 second time difference for preload > versus parallel in the beginning), do I have that right?
That's right. > Do you prefer the non-preload approach? No, I think we should stick to a more general approach unless we have to perform the loading itself differently for the special modules. And currently, we don't have any difference between loading them and all the other - the calls to `FindTargetModuleForImageInfo` are all the same. So I'm in favor of the preload variant. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110439 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
