medismailben wrote: > This looks better to me. I'm not sure why we were using defines from > llvm::DWARF that seem to overlap the ones here, however. So I'll defer to > Adrian or someone more knowledgeable about that side of things.
Yeah, that wasn't clear to me either, why didn't we just use the types in `llvm::dwarf::SourceLanguageName` and had to generate a new enum from the same table-gen file. @adrian-prantl any guesses ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111929 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
