zturner added inline comments. ================ Comment at: lit/CMakeLists.txt:14 @@ -13,1 +13,3 @@ +option(LLDB_TEST_CLANG "Use in-tree clang when testing lldb" Off) + ---------------- beanz wrote: > The `LLDB_TEST_COMPILER` option doesn't signify that it is using an in-tree > or out-of-tree compiler which is significant if we're going to tie the test > target to depending on the clang target. We could support that option in > addition to this one, but I see them as distinctly different. At the same time, setting `LLDB_TEST_COMPILER` to something and `LLDB_TEST_CLANG` seem to be incompatible with each other. Should we error if both of them are set?
Another possibility is to allow one to set `LLDB_TEST_COMPILER` to be set to a magic value like `<in-tree>` https://reviews.llvm.org/D24591 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
