vogelsgesang wrote: > However, with these new "hiding frame" recognizers, we are using the frame > hiding recognizers to handle "step out past hidden frames". So if - as was > done in the original implementation - we're determining this during execution > control, its hard to see how we can avoid running these recognizers all the > time. That argues for not allowing unbounded backtracing in recognizers.
Good point, that's something which probably should be changed... CC @adrian-prantl > [...] So it would be better to make this an explicit gesture somehow. `StackFrameList::GetSelectedFrameIndex` already takes a parameter `select_most_relevant` which enables the frame recognizers only for user-visible stops. At least from a cursory look over all its callers, it looks like what you are proposing? (Not sure if I missed anything, though. Still new to the lldb code base...) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109594 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
