BTW, what tests are failing for you now? I bet they failures are caused by one of two things: - unexpected compiler, for which we don't have the correct @xfail annotations: the annotations are correct for gcc-4.8, gcc-4.9, clang-3.5, clang-3.6 and ToT clang. If you have a different compiler, they could be wrong, in which case we can fix them. - environment setup problems, probably a missing package (libstdc++-dev ?, I forget whether it is needed these days). We can at least add these to the web page.
If you send me a list of failures, I can try to take a look what is going on. pl On 2 September 2016 at 22:09, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > mgorny added a comment. > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23882#527682, @ki.stfu wrote: > >> lgtm if tests are passed > > > I can't say tests pass for me right now, but the results (failures, errors > and unexpected passes) are the same with and without the patch. > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D23882 > > > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
