clayborg added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23290#511433, @joshimbriani wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23290#511275, @clayborg wrote: > > > Can you explain the scenarios where you are going to use LLDB with pipes? > > > Sure! Essentially we are duplicating some of the functionality of the command > line, specifically when commands need confirmation (like process handle or > breakpoint delete). We are interacting with LLDB to confirm these commands > via pipes. And since pipes aren't inherently interactive, we need a way to > override the interactivity check so that LLDB will give us the output we > want, regardless of whether we are using pipes or not. I think we all got that part. The question is why are you interacting via text input/output and not using the C++ API? https://reviews.llvm.org/D23290 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
