tfiala added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20193#430073, @zturner wrote:
> Ahh wait. Does the "wb" issue still need to be resolved first, or is that > specific to testing the test? That was specific to testing the test. It normally goes over a socket, which doesn't have that open issue. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20193 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
