ovyalov added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18886#395216, @labath wrote:
> Does this fix an existing test or is a new issue? If it's new (it sounds like
> it is, as I don't see any test failures), could you also add a test for this.
> It shouldn't be too difficult to write one... Would something like this:
>
> dbg.SetAsync(true)
> process.Continue()
> lldbutil.expect_state_changes(self,dbg.GetListener(), [eStateRunning])
> target.BreakpointCreateBySourceRegex("// some code which will not get
> executed by the inferior")
> do_some_assertions_on_the_breakpoint()
> while dbg.GetListener().WaitForEvent(2, event):
> if SBProcess.GetStateFromEvent(event) == eStateStopped and
> SBProcess.GetRestartedFromEvent(state):
> continue
> if SBProcess.GetStateFromEvent(event) == eStateRunning:
> continue
> self.fail("Setting a breakpoint generated an unexpected event:
> %s"%SBDebugger.StateAsCString(SBProcess.GetStateFromEvent(event)));
>
>
> do the trick?
Thanks for suggested test, Pavel.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18886
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
