fjricci added a comment. Would we want this overloaded method taking an int (fd) instead of a FILE* to be present in the API? Or hidden somehow? I'm new to swig, but it looks like python-extensions.swig includes some private extensions to the CommandReturnObject class already.
Overloading with an fd argument seems quite a bit more complex than doing what we do now but setting transfer_ownership in the underlying `CommandReturnObject::SetImmediateOutputFile()` call to true (which could probably be done either with a new swig extension or by changing the api). Do you think it's worth the added complexity? http://reviews.llvm.org/D18459 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
