Okay cool.

I just got a clean build here on a local OS X machine.  Thanks for
addressing that, Pavel!  I looked at the diffs and they made sense vs. the
behavior I saw last night.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:

> I'm still waiting for the buildbots to finish, but yeah, it's looking
> good so far.
>
> On 8 December 2015 at 15:51, Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > I think Pavel cleared this up.  I'm checking now.  If there's anything
> > remaining, I'll resolve it after I see what happens.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> zturner added a comment.
> >>
> >> To be clear, we explicitly set the LLDB_TEST environment variable as
> part
> >> of initialization, and it's now trying to read the value of the
> >> environment
> >> variable before it's been set.  At least I think anyway, I'm going off
> of
> >> memory, don't have code in front of me.
> >>
> >>
> >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D15318
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Todd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-commits mailing list
> > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
> >
>



-- 
-Todd
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to