This doesn't look substantially different than builder_freebsd. Assuming there is no practical difference, how about just using that for both freebsd and netbsd?
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 6:17 PM Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-commits < lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > krytarowski created this revision. > krytarowski added reviewers: emaste, tfiala. > krytarowski added subscribers: joerg, lldb-commits. > krytarowski set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM. > > This is used in tests. > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D15065 > > Files: > packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py > packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/plugins/builder_netbsd.py > > Index: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/plugins/builder_netbsd.py > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null > +++ packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/plugins/builder_netbsd.py > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +from builder_base import * > + > +def buildDsym(sender=None, architecture=None, compiler=None, > dictionary=None, clean=True): > + return False > Index: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py > =================================================================== > --- packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py > +++ packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py > @@ -430,6 +430,8 @@ > def builder_module(): > if sys.platform.startswith("freebsd"): > return __import__("builder_freebsd") > + if sys.platform.startswith("netbsd"): > + return __import__("builder_netbsd") > return __import__("builder_" + sys.platform) > > def run_adb_command(cmd, device_id): > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
