zturner added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D14793#293007, @clayborg wrote:
> Yes, I agree Zach, the caller of SaveCore should verify the process is in a > good state first. The only downside of that is if the windows mini-dumper can > actually make a core file on a running process, we might want to allow this > and make actual SaveCore implementations make that call? Windows has to have a stopped process before you can make a core. In other windows debuggers (MSVC and WinDbg, for example) the user of the debugger has to issue a stop command before the "Save Core Dump" command will work. http://reviews.llvm.org/D14793 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
