mohit.bhakkad requested a review of this revision. mohit.bhakkad added a comment.
> Note, if you end up going with the current patch, isn't quite right, however. > You need to move the check for the watchpoint ignore count up before > printing out the old & new values. An ignored watchpoint shouldn't print > anything, it should be as if it never stopped. Where you have the check, the > old & new values will get printed even if the watchpoint is ignored. Hi @jingham, I re-checked it today, we are not printing anything when we ignore a watchpoint. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D13296 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
