clayborg added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13727#268091, @tberghammer wrote:
> I agree that parking the threads in the kernel should be very cheap (I am not > sure about Windows) but on high end multi core machines having 40+ threads > around just to wait for work is a bit strange for me too and it definitely > makes debugging of LLDB more difficult. Ok, maybe we can pick a larger timeout then like say 2 seconds? > In the near future I expect that we will use the TaskPool only for very heavy > computations while we filling up our internal caches (such as debug info > parsing or symtab parsing) and then don't use it for anything later. I want to used it in many ModuleList functions like: ModuleList::FindFunctionSymbols() ModuleList::FindFunctions() ModuleList::FindCompileUnits() ModuleList::FindGlobalVariables() ModuleList::FindSymbolsWithNameAndType() ModuleList::FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType() and many more. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13727 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
