granata.enrico accepted this revision. granata.enrico added a comment. I am not deeply involved in MI internals, so I am going to assume you ran the test suite, and that you actually verified that types without summaries still work
In general, once you opt into data formatters, you get a lot more than simply UTF handling. I understand that this is your rationale for the change, but you may want to make sure that MI still does the right thing if users define formatters for types that have nothing to do with strings (e.g. what if somebody does define a summary for int or float?) With that said, this looks reasonable, and an MI refactoring would be outside of my realm anyway. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13058 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
