krytarowski added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12750#244435, @sas wrote:

> @brucem, not sure exactly what way forward you are suggesting. LLDB build 
> system supports cmake 2.8.12 and up, so we can't use FindBacktrace unless we 
> bump that to 3.0. Are we recommending we do that?


Can we do this later, after merging this change at it is? For now I won't be 
able to test the new approach.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12750#248348, @sas wrote:

> I'm fine with this patch the way it is. Unless @brucem refuses, I'll submit 
> it. Improving cmake checks can be dealt with later on.


We have got CMake 2.8 set as the minimal requirement.

  cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)

I'm willing to push NetBSD bits first and then refactor for all platforms.

Are you OK with it @brucem?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D12750



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to