On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:25:44PM +0000, Todd Fiala wrote: > tfiala added a comment. > > Dawn, the output supported by the command shouldn't have been changed. I'll > have a peek at what may have caused that to happen. All this change was > trying to do was stop the need to call dosep and roll that behavior into > dotest.
Can you add the 'dosep.py -s -o "-v"' behavior to 'dotest.py -v'? I think that may be all that's needed in order to show the same output as before with all the desired details. Note: before the -s option was added to dosep.py, 'dosep.py -o "-v"' would only show the info that 'dotest.py -v' shows now (after your change). Afer the -s option was added to dosep.py, 'dosep.py -s -o "-v"' would report the same info as 'dotest.py -v' did before your change. I.e. dosep.py's -s option may be the key to fixing the regressions in 'dotest.py -v'. Thanks for looking into this! -Dawn _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
