Hi Ross,

Connecting a RTSP client to receive a multicast RTP stream should not change the RTP stream at all - so (unless you have a firewall or other middlebox somewhere that is altering the RTP stream) there must be a mistake in the way that your RTSP server application
is delivering this stream.

I believe, there still needs to be a RTSP handshake for VLC to join the multicast stream. This is code which has run for many years. The change I made recently was to calculate the presentation time for each frame based on the frame-rate, eg 40ms for 25fps, rather than calling gettimeofday() for every frame. Without this change, VLC was displaying a jerky video stream. The change in presentationtime calculation fixed this jitter but has led to this new issue, where multiple VLC sessions can cause
a huge jump in presentation time.

I can't debug this without seeing your server code (in particular, how you're using "RTSPServer"). However, to start, you should run the existing "testH264VideoStreamer" demo application (in the "testProgs" directory), and make sure that this works correctly for you on your network (with multiple RTSP clients). Then, compare the code for that application with your code, to see what is going wrong. (Note, in particular, that - to deliver a multicast stream - your server needs to use a "PassiveServerMediaSubsession" rather than an "OnDemandServerMediaSubsession"
(which is meant only for delivering a stream via unicast).)

Yes I use PassiveServerMediaSubsession for the multicast stream. I'm sure it's a corruption of presentation time which is causing the issue, but this does not seem to be in my code. I have added debug to every place where fPresentationTime is changed.

I have tried to attach a screenshot of the wirshark trace so you can see how the time jumps for one consecutive frame to the next when a
VLC session is started and connected.

- David
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel

Reply via email to