But why not?
If, e.g., my source has a 1fps frame rate, why not wait 900ms avoid a busy-wait?
And about h264 teardowns, any idea what might be causing them?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:43:39 -0700
From: Ross Finlayson <finlay...@live555.com>
To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use
<live-de...@ns.live555.com>
Subject: Re: [Live-devel] RTSP Server suddenly stops streaming
Message-ID: <8872347d-71fb-470f-9ee8-5c08b2e7b...@live555.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> nextTask() = envir().taskScheduler().scheduleDelayedTask(50000,
> (TaskFunc*)FramedSource::afterGetting, this);
Why are you delaying the call to ?FramedSource::afterGetting(this)? by 50 ms?
Once you?ve delivered a frame of data to the downstream object, you should call
FramedSource::afterGetting(this);
*immediately*.
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDADE: Este e-mail e quaisquer ficheiros informáticos com
ele transmitidos são confidenciais e destinados ao conhecimento e uso exclusivo
do respectivo destinatário, não podendo o conteúdo dos mesmos ser alterado.
Caso tenha recebido este e-mail indevidamente, queira informar de imediato o
remetente e proceder à destruição da mensagem.
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. Their contents may not be altered. If you have
received this e-mail in error please notify the sender and destroy it
immediately.
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
