> What's the correct way for my derived class to write a response? Currently > the only solution I can see is to also derive from RTSPClientConnection and > add a new function that forwards to setRTSPResponse (it's not virtual, so I > can't just override it). However it seems like setRTSPResponse() should > simply be public.
Making the (4) "setRTSPResponse()" functions public wouldn't be ideal (because we don't want *anyone* to be able to call these functions), but because it solves your problem, it's probably a reasonable hack to make in the code. (It'll be included in the next release of the software.) Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
