> We are currently implementing our RTSP client I don't understand. If you're implementing your own RTSP client, then why not have it use the standard RTP/UDP transport? The overhead is negligible, and you get several benefits (including proper handling of reordered packets, and RTCP reception statistics) from using a standard transport.
But anyway, if you program your client to use a "Transport:" header with "RAW/RAW/UDP" as the transport in the RTSP "SETUP" command, then our LIVE555 RTSP server implementation will probably accept that (even though it returned "RTP/AVP" in the SDP response to the previous "DESCRIBE" command). Because you're using a non-standard protocol, however, you can expect no further support from me on this. Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
