> I have run performance monitoring, again mentioned in an earlier post and I
> know pretty well that the “OnDemandRTSPServer” is consuming about 7% of my
> CPU time when Idle (just ran the tests and the earlier figure I quoted was
> not accurate).
> My hope was to reduce this to an absolute minimum by changing to a true event
> driven server.
I don't understand this comment at all. The server *is* a "true event driven"
server. All LIVE555 applications are event driven.
It's difficult to see how a 'null' task running every 10 ms (which is also an
event, BTW) could be consuming 7% of your CPU. However, if (and only if) you
don't use any event triggers in your application, then I suggest that you - as
an experiment - comment out the line
schedulerTickTask(this); // ensures that we handle events frequently
on line 46 of "BasicUsageEnvironment/BasicTaskScheduler.cpp", recompile, and
check how this affects your server's CPU time. Please let me know.
If - even after commenting out that line - your server still consumes CPU when
idle, then you have a problem somewhere in your system. However, if your CPU
time drops to zero when you comment out that line, then I'll add an (optional)
parameter to "BasicTaskScheduler::createNew()" to allow you to disable the
'schedulerTickTask'. (Note, though, that you could use this only if you
*don't* use event triggers at all.)
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
