> To get around the problem, I hacked initiate() to avoid changing the port > number when fProtocolName is UDP, I added the diff to the end of this > message. I don't have a very deep understanding of this code base, maybe > this was the wrong approach, but this patch met my immediate needs. I'm > guessing my case here is either fairly obscure or I missed a better way of > dealing with this.
Thanks for the note. Yes, your case is somewhat obscure (and I hope that your network doesn't reorder packets, because - without RTP - you won't be able to handle this properly). If you have any control over your server, you should consider fixing it so that it uses RTP (and with an even-numbered port) rather than raw-UDP. Nonetheless, I'll update this code in a future release of the software to do something similar. Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/
_______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
